JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     

Anesth Analg 2008; 107:1618-1620
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817b7c35
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Modell, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Morey, T. E.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Modell, J. H.
Right arrow Articles by Morey, T. E.
Related Collections
Right arrow Economics and Health Care Research
Right arrow Neuroanesthesia
Right arrow Anesthetic Techniques
Right arrow Patient Safety

PATIENT SAFETY

Body Temperature Change During Anesthesia for Electroconvulsive Therapy: Implications for Quality Incentives in Anesthesiology

Jerome H. Modell, MD, DSc (Hon.), Nikolaus Gravenstein, MD, and Timothy E. Morey, MD

From the Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Jerome H. Modell, MD, DSc (Hon), Department of Anesthesiology, PO Box 100254, Gainesville, FL. Address e-mail to modeljh{at}shands.ufl.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The American Society of Anesthesiologists has announced that perioperative normothermia is a "Quality Incentive in Anesthesiology." We examined whether we could meet this quality incentive in a simple population: patients undergoing anesthesia for electroconvulsive therapy (ECT).

METHODS: We compared infrared-measured ear temperature before anesthesia to temperature upon delivery of patients to the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) after 101 consecutive brief anesthetics to facilitate ECT.

RESULTS: For 35 procedures, the patients had an infrared ear thermometer temperature of <36°C before anesthesia was administered, and 18 had a temperature of <36°C after anesthesia when transferred to the PACU. For 30 anesthetics, the patients' temperature decreased during anesthesia, for 64 anesthetics it increased during anesthesia, and for 7 it did not change. Overall examination of the data demonstrated no correlation between preprocedure and postprocedure temperature.

DISCUSSION: We conclude that there was no consistent change in temperature during anesthesia between our study patients when anesthesia was administered to facilitate ECT. If patients' tympanic temperatures were below 36°C upon admission to the PACU, it would be incorrect to conclude that intraprocedural temperature management measures were substandard. Also, current methods of measuring temperature may be inadequate to ascertain if patients are hypothermic after surgery. As the avoidance of hypothermia is a meritorious goal, anesthesia departments need to ensure that their temperature monitoring equipment is adequate to ensure accurate measurement of postanesthetic temperature if this variable is to be used as a quality incentive.






Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.