JOURNAL HOME CME HOME THIS MONTH PAST ISSUES ETOC COLLECTIONS
AUTHORS REVIEWERS EDITORIAL BOARD FEEDBACK RSS HELP
A&A International Anesthesia Research Society
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


Anesth Analg 2008; 107:1742-1745
© 2008 International Anesthesia Research Society
doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e31817bd11f
This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a colleague
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Katircioglu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Damar, H.
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation
Right arrow Articles by Katircioglu, K.
Right arrow Articles by Damar, H.
Related Collections
Right arrow Outcomes
Right arrow Patient Safety
Right arrow Regional Anesthesia


ANALGESIA

A Retrospective Review of 34,109 Epidural Anesthetics for Obstetric and Gynecologic Procedures at a Single Private Hospital in Turkey

Kaan Katircioglu, MD*{dagger}, Levent Hasegeli, MD*, H. Fehmi Ibrahimhakkioglu, MD*, Berkay Ulusoy, MD*, and Huseyin Damar, MD*

From the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, *Izmir Cinarli Obstetric and Gynecologic Hospital, and {dagger}Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Izmir, Turkey.

Address correspondence and reprint requests to Kaan Katircioglu, MD, Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Izmir Ataturk Training and Research Hospital, Basinsitesi, Izmir, Turkey. Address e-mail to kaankat{at}yahoo.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We examined the safety of the routine use of epidural anesthesia by an experienced anesthetic team in a select group of obstetric and gynecologic patients.

METHODS: All anesthetic records and an obstetric department database from 1993 to 2006 were retrospectively reviewed (n = 35,628 cases). Success rate, major complication rates, and mortality rates were the major end-points of the study.

RESULTS: We performed 34,109 epidural blocks in obstetric and gynecologic anesthesia. The epidural rate increased from 57% to 96% over a 14-yr period. Permanent neurological sequel, cardiac arrest, or mortality and maternal mortality were not seen during this period.

CONCLUSIONS: Epidural anesthesia/analgesia, as performed in a private hospital in Turkey by five experienced anesthesiologists for a select group of patients, was a reliable and safe procedure.







Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins Anesthesia & Analgesia® is published for the International Anesthesia Research Society® by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins with the assistance of Stanford University Libraries' HighWire Press®. Copyright 2006 by the International Anesthesia Research Society. Online ISSN: 1526-7598   Print ISSN: 0003-2999 HighWire Press
Copyright © 2008 by the International Anesthesia Research Society.